Get me off this crazy thing!
July 21st, 2007 11:50:36 am pst by 
Sterling Camden
Kent Newsome knows how to craft a metaphor, as “Technorati’s George Jetson on the link treadmill approach” (to measuring authority) demonstrates.
Kent was responding to Edelman’s new Social Media index, which seeks to rank authority by factoring in the use of non-blog social media in addition to the traditional monitoring of blog linkage. Kent points out that this new score is still more a measure of popularity than of authority, and seems to say that Technorati does a good enough job at that already.
Supposing you could come up with an accurate measure of authority, would that really be useful? I have to ask, “authority on what?” Does it really matter how your overall authority stacks up against Engadget (30,053), unless you’re Gizmodo (23,072)? If I want to learn about Ruby, I’d get a lot more out of reading Reg (301) or Assaf (168) than by searching on TechCrunch (21,636) or Boing Boing (25,574). And people looking for help with Synergy/DE had better come to little ol’ me (55).
No site can cover everything with authority. Nobody is omniscient. To become an expert in one area, you must ignore other areas to some degree. Authority on a given topic rests with those who concentrate on it. Any measure of “general authority” is therefore flawed.
What you’d really like to know is whether or not you are reaching your target audience(s). The best measures that I have seen for that aren’t simple scores. They involve analyzing your referrer links and comment activity. Not how many links so much as where they are coming from. Are other sites linking to yours on topic, or are they pointing out your overuse of jargon? Are search engine referrals finding you on keywords that your content really addresses, or did an unfortunate confluence of terms bring you would-be meth makers and porn perusers? Most importantly, do comments and links form a meaningful discussion of your subject matter?
Yes, it is possible to assess authority, within specific domains. But it isn’t as simple as visiting Technorati, and I doubt it can ever be accurately distilled into a number.
Posted in Geek Meditations, Get Real, Wildly popular | 
6 Comments » RSS 2.0 | Sphere it!
Subscribe by Email
This is an issue that’s bugged me since I started blogging. As you know, my field is science fiction (and related tech geekery to some degree), and there’s no avoiding the issue that it’s one hell of a niche market. Every now and again someone tots up the ranks of the blogs in the field informally, which is helpful, but it’s a periodical thing. Maybe we need someone to come up with a sort of authority lensing platform? You know, submit your blog to the subject area that you claim to be working in for peer review, and see how it shapes up on rank, traffic and links against other self-announced blogs of the same type.
(BTW, if someone IPOs this idea in six months, I’m using this comment as prior art for a lawsuit. I need to quit my dayjob.)
You’ve been tagged.
I think the closest thing to an “authority” ranking number we have right now that actually works, at least sometimes, is Google PageRank. For one thing, it tends to be more indicative of how well you’re doing within your niche than a straight-up popularity measure like Technorati’s rankings.
@Paul: You might be on to something there. The real trick, as I see it, is establishing authority in a single subject area. Most blogs aren’t devoted entirely to one subject, so you’d have to somehow segregate content and links along subject lines for any measure to be meaningful.
@Tish: Thanks, I will respond.
@apotheon: Apparently PageRank factors in longevity as well as linkage, so you could be right about that. But I think we have to be careful to take any numeric ranking with a pinch of salt.
Agreed. A single-axis numeric ranking is very limited, and prone to failures of applicability.
Of course, I’m not entirely sure I much care, except as an academic exercise.
[...] Get me off this crazy thing! [...]