Chip's Quips
A tiny spark of wit for a highly flammable world

Chipping the web – when I started

January 16th, 2007 6:21:33 pm pst by Sterling Camden

Chipping the web

Vinyl single: phonograph records made from vinyl (polyvinyl chloride) that rotate at 45 RPM are (or were) often called “singles” because they usually held only one track per side.

Doug Karr puts the “network” in, um, “networking”. Thanks, Doug!

How do I link-love thee? Let me count the ways.

You are 48% white and nerdy.
How White and Nerdy Are You?

What, no Doctor Who reference? Thanks, Randy.

The Magic-Food-Money-Love-Sleep Pentagon.

Posted in Share the Love | 12 Comments » RSS 2.0 | Sphere it!

RSS feed | Trackback URI

12 Comments »

MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by Doug Karr

No… thank-you, Chip! You’ve provided some great traffic, commentary, and been a great reader of my blog and I really appreciate it.

Thanks Again,
Doug

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by Stu Savory Subscribed to comments via email

Off Topic.

Why is your blog so big and slow, Sterling? It seems to be about 300kB (rather than -say- 30 kB) although it is mostly text and the pics youhave are small? What’s causing all the overhead?

Just FYI.

Stu

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by apotheon Subscribed to comments via email

Stu: It probably has something to do with the ads. Specifically, I seem to recall that Amazon ads tend to be presented via iframes.

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by sterling Subscribed to comments via email

As apotheon said, Amazon ads use an iframe loaded from an Amazon server. I might try taking that down to see if it makes a difference. There is also a fair amount of javascript being executed to serve the Google ads and log page views and such. I’ll have to give it some more analysis. Thanks for the heads up, Stu.

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by sterling Subscribed to comments via email

Ha. I had been playing around with Grazr in the sidebar and accidentally left a widget open. That probably had a fairly large overhead.

I also removed the Amazon ads. I have yet to make any money off those anyway.

How’s it look now, Stu?

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by Stu Savory Subscribed to comments via email

Still about 350 kByte, not appreciably faster :-(

For comparison, mine is 55kB at halfway thru the month (I archive monthly so it doesn’t get too big). My blog for March 2005 was the biggest at 99 kB. No ads, no bucket-lists (since almost no-one was using them anyway). But hand coded :-)

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by sterling Subscribed to comments via email

Stu, there you have one advantage of hand-coding everything yourself. You know exactly what’s being exchanged.

What tool are you using to measure the bandwidth consumed?

Thanks again

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by Stu Savory Subscribed to comments via email

I browse with Opera. It shows me the size of stuff in transit and the number of objects.

And it’s safer than IEx for any and all values of x ;-)

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by Stu Savory Subscribed to comments via email

Oh and I have a THREE sided single :-)
In the late 60s Private Eye cut a record with two tracks on one side, two starting points 180 degrees apart, so it was a random choice what you got to hear.

MOST confusing :-)

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by apotheon Subscribed to comments via email

It’s also possible that some JavaScript stuff might be inflating page size by causing things to be downloaded that are not displayed when you view source — and since Google AdSense uses Javascript, once again advertising might be a major culprit.

I’d check out what Firefox reports about page size at SOB (my own weblog, using the same WordPress software Sterling uses) as a point of comparison, but it reports “Unknown” as the page size on the main page so I’m afraid that’s not working so well. On the other hand, opening a single article on mine reports page sizes around 15KB, while this page at Chip’s Quips reports nearly 250KB, so clearly there’s a difference, and it’s not (just) Google AdSense.

Then again, I don’t have nearly the massive sidebar Sterling uses, so maybe advertising isn’t such a major culprit after all.

 
MyAvatars 0.2
Comment by sterling Subscribed to comments via email

I had forgotten about that feature of Opera. I generally use Firefox 2.0, but I’ll make use of Opera for that purpose in the future. Thanks for the tip!

That’s a bizarre but ingenious idea for a 45.

 
MyAvatars 0.2

[...] When I started this blog, I was 46 years old. [...]

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Better Tag Cloud