Chipping the web: August 27th
August 28th, 2008 7:00:26 am pst by Sterling Camden
- The Banana Test | Burningbird’s RealTech
Shelley adds her own programming animal.
Tags: programming humor languages - eigenclass – Some functional programming and OCaml koans
The Zen of FP. Thanks, Reg.
Tags: zen programming ocaml koans functional - Do you know any programmers that exhibit these personality traits…? « Learning Lisp
Present — like Reg.
Tags: traits psychology programming personality organization - Neanderthals: not stupid, just different | Science | guardian.co.uk
Neener, neener, GEICO!
Thanks, Paul.
Tags: neanderthals research - Why it’s hard to make machines think original thoughts | Think Artificial
Finding the sweet spot between "original" and "nonsensical".
Tags: ai creativity software - Stu Savory’s Blog – Ignorant American woman – words fail me!
I'm making a wild guess that Geography isn't her favorite Trivial Pursuit category
Tags: georgia russia stusavory
Posted in Share the Love | 6 Comments » RSS 2.0



Re: creative AI :
Back in the 80s I wrote a couple of textbooks about (elementary) AI, Chip. One of them contained source code in Prolog for doing the simplest kind of machine creativity, basically working its way through a combinatorial explosion of interface definitions.
Constraint rules restricted the size of the explosion-space.
You merely defined what inputs (sensors?) were available and what outputs you wanted and let the program work out the nitty gritty of the HW design in the middle
The big brother of that simple program produced some original HW designs
And yet it was too brittle.
I point you to the work of Doug Lenat (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Lenat) whose work at CyC is still ongoing (but, I fear, a dead end).
Wow, Stu, I bet that code would be pretty interesting to read. And thanks for the WP link.
There’s some nontrivial similarity between myself and the Learning Lisp list of personality traits, too.
Yeah, it’s scary. Some of them I wouldn’t have admitted before.
LOL – I especially got a kick out of the banana test link this time around.
Maybe I’m just glad that the banana got spared in this scenario. LOL.
Shelley certainly has a realistic view of JavaScript — er, I mean, ECMAScript.